When offending the Muslim world seems a small price to pay
Oct 20th 2012 | YANGON |
IT IS as if a veil had been lifted to reveal a hideous blemish. Terrible
ethnic and religious violence in June in Myanmar’s western state of
Rakhine pitted Buddhists against the mostly Muslim Rohingya minority.
The aftermath risks marring the coming-out celebrations of Myanmar’s
hugely welcome rejection of tyrannous isolation. Thein Sein, a former
general who has become the country’s reforming president, is thought by
some unlucky to have lost this year’s Nobel peace prize (to the EU). But
on October 15th he reneged on an agreement to let the Organisation of
Islamic Co-operation (OIC) open an office in Myanmar’s commercial hub,
Yangon.
The OIC, which groups 57 countries with large Muslim populations, wanted
to help the Rohingyas. They make up most of the 75,000 people displaced
by the violence into camps around Sittwe, the capital of Rakhine. Aid
workers say their conditions are dire, with many suffering malnutrition.
Sanitation is woeful.
Myanmar has 135 recognised ethnic groups. A belief that nearly unites
them is that the Rohingyas are not Burmese, but illegal “Bengali”
settlers, who should be in Bangladesh or elsewhere. Mr Thein Sein
himself has suggested the solution to Myanmar’s Rohingya problem is to
deport them all. No other country, however, accepts them. And so they
are stateless.
Many Muslim countries wanted to channel aid to Rohingyas through the OIC
(such as most of the $50m pledged by Saudi Arabia). But, the president
said, opening an OIC office would not be “in accordance with the
people’s desires”. This was a response to demonstrations, often led by
Buddhist monks, against the proposed office. They took place in a number
of cities, including Yangon, Mandalay and, especially, Sittwe.
There are competing analyses of the president’s decision. The most
optimistic is that, in the new Myanmar, it is impossible to suppress
protests violently, especially if they are led by monks. A more cynical
view is that the government tolerated or even instigated the protests to
give it a pretext. Many of the demonstrations were without the
approvals required under Burmese law, yet nobody has been punished.
The government’s motive was simple, Rohingya politicians say. It wants
to keep foreign eyes out as it makes life in Myanmar so intolerable for
Rohingyas that those still in the country join the diaspora, who, at an
estimated 1.5m or more, already outnumber them.
The only thing that might sway Burmese opinion in favour of the
Rohingyas, some say, would be the staunch support of Myanmar’s most
famous and revered politician, the opposition leader, Aung San Suu Kyi.
But she has been largely silent on their plight. Perhaps the only thing
that might dent the popularity she and her party enjoy would be for her
to take up the cudgels on behalf of this benighted minority.
No comments:
Post a Comment